Instituto Tecnologico Y De Estudios Superiores De Monterrey Campus Morelos
Euthanasia- From a Kantian Perspective
Active Euthenasia – From A Kantian Perspective
Euthanasia is one of society’s more widely debated moral issues of our time. Active euthanasia is; “Doing something, such as administering a lethal drug, or using other ways that will cause a person’s death.”In the other hand, Passive euthanasia is; “Stopping (or not starting) a treatment, that will make a person die, the condition of the person will cause his or her death.”It seems that this one is not to debate, as much as the other one (active). I have chosen to look more closely at the issue of active euthanasia, and that it should notbe considered ethical, by Kantian standards.
Those who support active euthanasia can argue that helping the ill to bring their own deaths, allowing them to determine the how and when, is not only a human act but also allows the person, who is “living to die,” to maintain their dignity; this way, they will let them die in peace, rather than suffer to the end. Because if not, they think of themselves as a disgrace, to those they love. According to recent researches and surveys, many Canadians would agree to this,but my question is, have they taken a close look at the ethical debate? Those who are against active euthanasia would say not, and would argue that by participating in the practice of active euthanasia, they are “playing God,” or perhaps, that they are not acting out of mercy, therefore, the act is nothing less than cold-blooded murder. Murder by the law is defined as; “The unlawful, premeditated killing of one human being by another.”Euthanasia, in Canada, remains unlawful as of today, and the act of euthanasia is premeditated, whether for the purpose of mercy or not, euthanasia is, by definition, murder. According to Kantia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


I'm Harold

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out